tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-665477407942506879.post3344632503040978623..comments2023-08-25T01:21:13.085-07:00Comments on Musings on Marketing and Other Morsels: does efficient = good?Real Life Mad Manhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08294630166875317850noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-665477407942506879.post-78768445444751650712010-06-02T20:09:24.423-07:002010-06-02T20:09:24.423-07:00Thank you so much!
Yes, I think it's going to...Thank you so much!<br /><br />Yes, I think it's going to become a matter of a new level of qualified leads. The people who reach your site through the more "traditional" keywords may be a higher quality lead. Maybe they know more about what you offer, or maybe they'll be able to appreciate what you offer more. But in terms of quantity, I think "conversational keywords" are going to become increasingly important, especially in the realm of Social Media.<br /><br />Thanks for stopping by!Real Life Mad Manhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08294630166875317850noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-665477407942506879.post-76260567354838189852010-06-02T15:43:54.137-07:002010-06-02T15:43:54.137-07:00Incredibly good post. Thanks for the kind words. I...Incredibly good post. Thanks for the kind words. I agree, linear seek and find has limits. And the "semantic web" will make it much less of the only game in town. But, until that happens, the straight taxonomy approach is the best way to match limited content creation resources with maximum chance of results. What you describe can indeed be a deeper, more interesting engagement, but it's so tough to do it in a methodical way. But perhaps that's your premise, that "method" is lesser.Jay Baerhttp://jay@convinceandconvert.comnoreply@blogger.com